General
In the Matter of Joseph Horvath et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Respondents, against Charles L. Patterson et al., Constituting the New York City Transit Authority, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
3 A.D.2d 730·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1957·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Joseph Horvath et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Respondents, against Charles L. Patterson et al., Constituting the New York City Transit Authority, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to annul the suspension of petitioners-respondents, employees of the New York City Transit Authority, and for other relief, the Authority appeals by permission (Civ. Prae. Act, § 1304) from so much of an order as denies its cross motion to dismiss the petition for 'insufficiency. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [3 Misc 2d 960.]