Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rosenthal v. Board of Education of Central High School District No. 3 of the Town of Hempstead et al., 1975 — 420 U.S. 985 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Rosenthal v. Board of Education of Central High School District No. 3 of the Town of Hempstead et al.
420 U.S. 985·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 24, 1975
No. 74-977.
Rosenthal v. Board of Education of Central High School District No. 3 of the Town of Hempstead et al.
MR. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:
No. 74-374, Times-Picayune Publishing Cory. v. Schulingkamp, infra, this page; No. 74-706, Pacelli v. United States, infra, p. 995; No. 74-749, Art Theatre Guild, Inc. v. Parrish, infra, p. 995; No. 74-5499, Carter v. Lee, infra, p. 995; No. 74-5706, Orange v. North Carolina, infra, p. 996; No. 74-5741, Hardwick v. Caldwell, infra, p. 996; No. 74-5810, May v. United States, infra, p. 996; No. 74-5815, Murphy v. United States, infra, p. 996; No. 74-5855, Wright v. United States, infra, p. 997; and No. 74-5942, Brown v. Estelle, infra, p. 996.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. N. Y.