General
The Cincinnati Northern Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. George E. Dillon
234 U.S. 753·Supreme Court of the United States·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 930.
The Cincinnati Northern Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. George E. Dillon.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio.
Motion to dismiss or affirm or place on the summary docket submitted May 25, 1914.
Decided June 22, 1914.
Mr. Frank L. Littleton for the plaintiff in error. Mr. W. H. Dailey for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed upon the authority of Southern Ry. Co. v. Carson, 194 U. S. 136, 140; Southern Ry. Co. v. Bennett, 233 U. S. 80, 85; Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. Lindsay, 233 U. S. 42, 49; Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Southern Ry. Co. v. Gadd, 233 U. S. 572.