General
City of Syracuse, Respondent, v. Richard M. Stacy et al., Appellants
167 N.Y. 614·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
City of Syracuse, Respondent, v. Richard M. Stacy et al., Appellants.
(Argued June 3, 1901;
decided June 11, 1901.)
Reported below, 45 App. Div. 249.
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 6,1899, affirming an order of Special Term confirming the report of commissioners of appraisal in condemnation proceedings.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Thomas Hogan and E: N. Wilson for motion.
Oharles A. Hawley and George Barrow opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.