General
Donald PEDIGO, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona and Bilby Produce Company, Inc., Respondents
104 Ariz. 433454 P.2d 975·Arizona Supreme Court·1969·AZ
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
454 P.2d 975
Donald PEDIGO, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona and Bilby Produce Company, Inc., Respondents.
No. 9641-PR.
Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.
May 28, 1969.
Gorey & Ely, by Stephen S. Gorey, Phoenix, for petitioner.
Robert D. Steclcner, Phoenix, Chief Counsel, By Michael A. Lasher, Jr., Phoenix, for respondent, The Industrial Commission.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
The Findings and Award of October 31, 1966 are res judicata, Wammack v. Industrial Commission, 83 Ariz. 321, 320 P.2d 950. Opinion of the Court of Appeals vacated and award of the Industrial Commission is ordered affirmed, 9 Ariz.App. 314, 451 P.2d 892.