Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
American Tradition Partnership, Inc., fka Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al. v. Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al., 2012 — 565 U.S. 1187 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
American Tradition Partnership, Inc., fka Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al. v. Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al.
565 U.S. 1187·Supreme Court of the United States·2012
with whom Justice Breyer joins,
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 17, 2012
No. 11A762.
American Tradition Partnership, Inc., fka Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al. v. Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al.
[MAJORITY — Justice Ginsburg,]
Application for stay, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, granted, and the Montana Supreme Court’s December 30, 2011, decision in case No. DA 11-0081 is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certio-rari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the issuance of the mandate of this Court.
Statement of
Justice Ginsburg,
with whom Justice Breyer joins,
respecting the grant of the application for stay.
Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm’n, 558 U. S. 310 (2010), make it exceedingly difficult to maintain that independent expenditures by corporations “do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.” Id., at 357. A petition for certiorari will give the Court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates’ allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway. Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court’s decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 490 U. S. 477, 484 (1989), I vote to grant the stay.