Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
William T. Plewinski, Respondent, v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Also Known as Conrail, Appellant
198 A.D.2d 886605 N.Y.S.2d 994·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1993·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William T. Plewinski, Respondent, v Consolidated Rail Corporation, Also Known as Conrail, Appellant.
[605 NYS2d 994]
[MAJORITY]
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with same Memorandum as in Wylie v Consolidated Rail Corp. (198 AD2d 884 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J. — Discovery.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.