General
CITY OF CHICAGO et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
394 U.S. 717·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CITY OF CHICAGO et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 1047.
Decided April 21, 1969
Raymond F. Simon, Nuél D. Belnap, and Harold E. Spencer for appellants in No. 1047. John W. Adams, William J. O’Brien, Jr., James H. Durkin, Bryce L. Hamilton, and Louis A. Schwartz for appellants in No. 1048.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Leonard S. Goodman, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al. in both cases.
Briefs of amici curiae were filed in No. 1047 by William J. Scott, Attorney General, and Robert F. Scott, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Illinois; by Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derew-goski, Solicitor General, and Nicholas V. Olds, Jerome Maslowski, and Curtis G. Beck, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State of Michigan; by Paul W. Brown, Attorney General, and Shelby V. Hutchins and /. Philip Redick, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State of Ohio; and by Joseph H. Nathanson for the Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority.
Together with No. 1048, Illinois Central Railroad Co. et al. v. City of Chicago et al., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.