Contracts · MBE-tested

BOYES v. UNITED STATES

373 U.S. 24210 L. Ed. 2d 409·Supreme Court of the United States·1963

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan would deny certiorari on the basis of their dissent in Sanders v. United States, ante, p. 23:

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

BOYES v. UNITED STATES. No. 59, Misc. Decided May 13, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated.and the case is remanded to the United States District' Court for the Western District of Texas for further consideration in light of Sanders v. United States, ante, p. 1. Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan would deny certiorari on the basis of their dissent in Sanders v. United States, ante, p. 23: