General
Elizabeth F. Arundell, Respondent, v. Jack Hellman et al., Individually and Doing Business as Trylon Service Station, Appellants
278 A.D. 654·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1951·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth F. Arundell, Respondent, v. Jack Hellman et al., Individually and Doing Business as Trylon Service Station, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with $10 costs. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ.