Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Baker, Treasurer of Baca County, et al., 1939 — 308 U.S. 620 · caselaw · US
General
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Baker, Treasurer of Baca County, et al.
308 U.S. 620·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 539.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Baker, Treasurer of Baca County, et al.
December 11, 1939.
Messrs. W. W. Grant, Morrison Shafroth, Chas. H. Woods, and Henry W. Toll for petitioner. Messrs. Byron G. Rogers and Henry E. Lutz for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.