Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PRICE, dba HOWARD PRICE & CO. v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA et al., 1965 — 382 U.S. 20 · caselaw · US
General
PRICE, dba HOWARD PRICE & CO. v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA et al.
382 U.S. 20·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PRICE, dba HOWARD PRICE & CO. v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA et al.
No. 144.
Decided October 11, 1965.
Carney M. Layne and Charles W. Yeager for appellant.
C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Philip J. Grasiani and C. Robert Sarver, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed in light of the representations of the Attorney General of West Virginia that there is open to the appellant an effective state procedure of which he has not availed himself.