Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chelal Clark, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Edward Clark et al., Appellants, 1872 — 47 N.Y. 664 · caselaw · US
General
Chelal Clark, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Edward Clark et al., Appellants
47 N.Y. 664·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Chelal Clark, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Edward Clark et al., Appellants.
Under the provisions of section 17, 1 R. S., p. 759, a record of a conveyance duly recorded, or a transcript thereof duly certified, is made original and primary evidence, and may- be introduced in evidence with the same effect as the original, and without proof of the loss or destruction of the latter.
(Argued January 25th, 1872;
decided January 30th, 1872.)
J. A. Pa/rsons for appellants.
Oled Edson for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Allen, J.,]
Allen, J.,
reads opinion for affirmance.
All concur. Judgment affirmed.