Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Accounting of Frances Baker, Appellant, as Administratrix of the Estate of Elizabeth Wilbur, Deceased. Mary Wilbur Irwin et al., Respondents, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 617 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Accounting of Frances Baker, Appellant, as Administratrix of the Estate of Elizabeth Wilbur, Deceased. Mary Wilbur Irwin et al., Respondents
172 N.Y. 617·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Accounting of Frances Baker, Appellant, as Administratrix of the Estate of Elizabeth Wilbur, Deceased. Mary Wilbur Irwin et al., Respondents.
Matter of Baker, 72 App. Div. 211, affirmed.
(Argued October 7, 1902;
decided October 21, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made March 4, 1902, which modified and affirmed as modified a decree of the Washington County Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of Frances Baker, as administratrix of the estate of Elizabeth Wilbur, deceased.
G. H. Spurges for appellant.
James G. Rogers for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs to the respondents payable out of the estate; no opinion.
Concur: Barker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.