General
In the Matter of the Application of James B. Eveline for a Writ of Mandamus. James B. Eveline, Appellant; William K. Mansfield et al., Respondents
162 N.Y. 659·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight and Martin, JJ. Absent,: Vann, J. Not sitting: Landon, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of James B. Eveline for a Writ of Mandamus. James B. Eveline, Appellant; William K. Mansfield et al., Respondents.
Matter of Eveline, 45 App. Div. 628, affirmed.
(Argued April 17, 1900;
decided May 1, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 16, 1899, affirming an order of Special Term denying an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus.
J. W. Atkinson for appellant.
Thomas O' Connor for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight and Martin, JJ. Absent,: Vann, J. Not sitting: Landon, J.