Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rasmussen v. Brownell, Attorney General, 1957 — 355 U.S. 859 · caselaw · US
General
Rasmussen v. Brownell, Attorney General
355 U.S. 859·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 17.
Rasmussen v. Brownell, Attorney General.
Jack Wasserman for petitioner, and Solicitor General Rankin for respondent, were on the stipulation.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 353 U. S. 907, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Dismissed per stipulation pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.