Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Swann et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education et al., 1970 — 397 U.S. 978 · caselaw · US
General
Swann et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education et al.
397 U.S. 978·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 16, 1970
No. —.
Swann et al. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education et al.
Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, and Conrad O. Pearson on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Motion to vacate order of United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and to reinstate order of the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied.