Administrative
EUREKA CEREAL BEVERAGE CO., Inc., v. PENNINGTON, Prohibition Adm'r, et al.
66 F.2d 1005·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
EUREKA CEREAL BEVERAGE CO., Inc., v. PENNINGTON, Prohibition Adm'r, et al.
No. 5097.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Aug. 16, 1933.
Sidney Simandl, of Newark, N. J. (Harold Simandl, of Newark, N. J., of counsel), for appellant.
Harlan Besson, U. S. Atty., of Trenton, N. J. (by Samuel Coben, of Newark, N. J.), for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CUEIAM.]
PER CUEIAM.
Apart from the failure of the plaintiff in this hill to make the commissioner a party [see opinion of this court in Chamberlain v. Lembeck, 18 F.(2d) 408], the year covered by the permit here involved had expired before this case was argued before this court, and the questions involved were then academic.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.