Corporations
Esther Frisch, Respondent, v. Menorah Construction Co., Inc., and Others, Defendants; Stoutenburgh Realty Corporation, Appellant
237 A.D. 897·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1933·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Esther Frisch, Respondent, v. Menorah Construction Co., Inc., and Others, Defendants; Stoutenburgh Realty Corporation, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to vacate order appointing receiver denied. Section 66 of the Civil Practice Act has no application to the situation herein. The question should be reviewed on an appeal from an order denying the relief sought. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.