General
Ex parte PATTON
206 Ala. 70089 So. 924·Alabama Supreme Court·1921·AL
ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(89 South. 924)
Ex parte PATTON.
(6 Div. 401.)
Supreme Court of Alabama.
April 21, 1921.
Rehearing Denied May 12, 1921.
Poster, Verner & Rice and Harwood, McKinley, McQueen & Aldridge, all of Tuscaloosa, A. PI. Carmichael, of Tuscumbia, E. B. Pite, of Hamilton, and L. D. Gray, of Jasper, for appellant.
Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., Horace C. Wilkinson, of Birmingham, and J. M. Pennington and W. C. Davis, both of Jasper, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — MILLER, J.]
MILLER, J.
The facts in this case are practically the same as in Ex parte Robert J. Lancaster, 89 South. 721. The. questions of law in each are identical. Under the law and rulings of this court in that case, the writ of prohibition prayed for in this should issue. The petition for writ of prohibition is granted.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.
Ante, p. 60.