General
Town of Monroe et al., Respondents, v. Jack Pearl et al., Appellants
274 A.D. 892·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1948·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Town of Monroe et al., Respondents, v. Jack Pearl et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
In an action to restrain alleged violations of a zoning ordinance and for incidental relief, order denying motion to dismiss the complaint as insufficient, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Order denying appellants’ motion to resettle order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Nolan and Wenzel, JJ., concur.