General
Beilfuss v. California
321 U.S. 746·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 603.
Beilfuss v. California.
February 7, 1944.
Mr. Morris Lavine for appellant. Messrs. Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General of California, and Frank Richards, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, 2d Appellate District, of California.
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.