Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Olga KINER, Administratrix, etc., et al., 1932 — 59 F.2d 1079 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Olga KINER, Administratrix, etc., et al.
59 F.2d 1079·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Olga KINER, Administratrix, etc., et al.
No. 9414.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
May 16, 1932.
Charles E. Sandall, U. S. Atty., of Omaha, Neb., and F. H. Wagener, Ins. Atty., U. S. Veterans’ Bureau, and Robert Van Pelt, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Lincoln, Neb.
G. E. Price and John Jacobson, both of Lincoln, Neb., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, on motion of appellees, without costs to either party in this court, on the authority of Old Nick Williams Co. v. United States, 215 U. S. 541, 30 S. Ct. 221, 54 L. Ed. 318; Credit Company Limited v. Arkansas Central Railway Co., 128 U. S. 258, 9 S. Ct. 107, 32 L. Ed. 448; Brooks v. Norris, 11 How. 204, 13 L. Ed. 665; Robie v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 40 F.(2d) 871 (C. C. A. 8); Northwestern Public Service Co. v. Pfeifer, 36 F.(2d) 5 (C. C. A. 8); and Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Leverentz, 19 F. (2d) 915 (C. C. A. 8).