General
Ex parte Mack CROW
211 Ala. 613101 So. 527·Alabama Supreme Court·1924·AL
ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(101 South. 527)
Ex parte Mack CROW.
(5 Div. 899.)
(Supreme Court of Alabama.
Oct. 6, 1924.)
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
Petition of Mack Crow for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment aid decision there rendered in the case styled Crow v. State, 101 So. 526.
James W. Strother, of Dadeville, for petitioner.
Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed.
[MAJORITY — SAYRE, J.]
SAYRE, J.
We find no erroneous statement of law in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. The inquiries proposed by petitioner would involve questions of fact which this court will not consider on applications for certiorari to the Court of Appeals. On this point Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 South. 91, has often been followed.
Writ denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.