Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Mississippi et al., 1964 — 377 U.S. 988 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Mississippi et al.
377 U.S. 988·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1097.
United States v. Mississippi et al.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Louis F. Claiborne, Harold H. Greene and Howard A. Glickstein for the United States.
Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, Dugas Shands, Assistant Attorney General, P. M. Stockett and Charles Clark, Special Assistant Attorneys General, and Aubrey Bell, for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. Probable jurisdiction noted.