Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
International Typographical Union et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al., 1952 — 344 U.S. 816 · caselaw · US
General
International Typographical Union et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
344 U.S. 816·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 56.
International Typographical Union et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
Henry Kaiser, Gerhard P. Van Arkel and Eugene Gressman for petitioners.
Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Mozart G. Ratner and Fannie M. Boyls for the National Labor Relations Board; and Elisha Hanson, William K. Van Allen and Arthur B. Hanson for the American Newspaper Publishers Association, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.