Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isaac W. Parmenter, Respondent, v. American Box Machine Company, Appellant, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
Isaac W. Parmenter, Respondent, v. American Box Machine Company, Appellant
162 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isaac W. Parmenter, Respondent, v. American Box Machine Company, Appellant.
Parmenter v. American Box Machine Co., 44 App. Div. 47, appeal dismissed.
(Argued April 16, 1900;
decided April 20, 1900.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 31, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at "a Trial Term, a jury having been waived.
The motion was-made upon the grounds that this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal, it not having been allowed by the Appellate Division or by a judge of the Court of Appeals, and that the exceptions taken during the trial are frivolous.
George S. Coleman for motion.
Julius M. Mayer opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, without costs.