Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wilton Realty Corp. et al. v. Weadock, Examiner, Securities & Exchange Commission, et al., 1940 — 308 U.S. 626 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Wilton Realty Corp. et al. v. Weadock, Examiner, Securities & Exchange Commission, et al.
308 U.S. 626·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 585.
Wilton Realty Corp. et al. v. Weadock, Examiner, Securities & Exchange Commission, et al.
January 15, 1940.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Messrs. Jason L. Honigman for Wilton Realty Corp., and Mr. George E. Brand for Equitable Trust Co., petitioners. Messrs. Paul Weadock and Harold H. Armstrong for Weadock, and Solicitor General Jackson and Mr. Chester T. Lane for the Securities & Exchange Commission, respondents.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.