General
Israel McDanolds, Respondent, v. George P. Titus, Appellant
57 N.Y. 655·New York Commission of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Israel McDanolds, Respondent, v. George P. Titus, Appellant.
(Argued January 9, 1874;
decided May term, 1874.)
The only questions of importance presented in this case were those of fact, upon which the court held that there was evidence to sustain the findings and they could not be reviewed.
J. A. Christie for the appellant.
W. L. Dailey for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Reynolds, C.,]
Reynolds, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur; Gray, C., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.