Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fred E. SUITS et al. v. MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM COMPANY et al., 1931 — 49 F.2d 1084 · caselaw · US
General
Fred E. SUITS et al. v. MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM COMPANY et al.
49 F.2d 1084·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fred E. SUITS et al. v. MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM COMPANY et al.
No. 347.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Jan. 19, 1931.
See, also, (D. C.) 31 F.(2d) 205; (C. C. A.) 40 F.(2d) 161; (C. C. A.) 43 F.(2d) 280.
Allen & Jarman, Everest, Dudley & Brewer, and Suits & Disney, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellants.
B. B. Blakeney and Kathryn Van Leuven, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellees.
Before COTTERAL," PHILLIPS, and MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed January 19, 1931, per stipulation, at costs of appellants.