Contracts · MBE-tested

McDANIEL v. NORTH CAROLINA

392 U.S. 66520 L. Ed. 2d 1359·Supreme Court of the United States·1968

Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226. · Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226. · Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 228.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

McDANIEL v. NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1599, Misc. Decided June 17, 1968. T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and George A. Goodwyn, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of North Carolina is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in the light of Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 219. Mr. Justice Black dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 226. Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Harrison v. United States, ante, p. 228.