Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward A. Van Alstine et al., Respondents, v. Alvin J. Belden et al., Appellants, 1900 — 161 N.Y. 661 · caselaw · US
General
Edward A. Van Alstine et al., Respondents, v. Alvin J. Belden et al., Appellants
161 N.Y. 661·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward A. Van Alstine et al., Respondents, v. Alvin J. Belden et al., Appellants.
Van Alstine v. Belden, 41 App. Div. 123, affirmed.
(Argued January 26, 1900;
decided February 13, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 2, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Albert P. Fowler for appellants.
George W. Driscoll for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, Bartlett, Hartin, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Vann, J.