Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Blue Cab Co. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1967 — 389 U.S. 837 · caselaw · US
General
Blue Cab Co. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board
389 U.S. 837·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 200.
Blue Cab Co. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board.
Charles L. Buey and Paul Levenfeld for petitioners.
Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
Sheldon M. Charone for Local 782, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, intervenor below.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.