Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United Construction Workers et al. v. Laburnum Construction Corp., 1954 — 346 U.S. 936 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
United Construction Workers et al. v. Laburnum Construction Corp.
346 U.S. 936·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 188.
United Construction Workers et al. v. Laburnum Construction Corp.
Welly K. Hopkins, Harrison Combs and M. E. Boiarsky for petitioners. Archibald G. Robertson and George E. Allen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia is granted limited to the following question:
“In view of the type of-conduct found by the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia to have been carried out by Petitioners, does the National Labor Relations Board have exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter so as to preclude the State Court from hearing and determining the issues in a common-law tort action based upon this conduct?”
The Government is invited to submit a memorandum setting forth the policy of the National Labor Relations Board in regard to: (1) the proviso in § 10 (a), 61 Stat. 146,29 U. S. C. (Supp. Ill) § 160 (a); and (2) other cases, apart from those in § 10 (a), in which the Board declines to exercise its statutory jurisdiction.' The memorandum should indicate by what standards the Board declines to act and whether the standards are applied by rule or regulation or on a case-by-case method.