General
ANDERSON v. COMPTOIS
108 F. 985·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1901
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ANDERSON v. COMPTOIS.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
February 21, 1901.)
No. 632.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the District of Alaska.
Jackson & Hatch, C. S. Johnson, E. S. Pillsbury, and K. M. Jockson, for appellant.
Hubbard, Beeman & Hume, for appellee.
T. J. Geary, for receiver Alexander McKenzie.
[MAJORITY]
No opinion. Pursuant to stipulation of counsel, judgment of district court reversed, and decree entered upon the merits m favor of appellants.