General
F. M. Wirgman et al., Appellants, v. H. H. Persons et al., Receivers, etc.
196 U.S. 636·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 189.
F. M. Wirgman et al., Appellants, v. H. H. Persons et al., Receivers, etc.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Motions to dismiss or affirm and petition for writ of certiorari submitted January 16, 1905.
Decided January 23, 1905.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. United States v. Jahn, 155 U. S. 109; McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Robinson v. Caldwell, 165 U. S. 359; American Sugar Refining Company v. New Orleans, 181 U. S. 277; Ayres v. Polsdorfer, 187 U. S. 585; Colorado Mining Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691.
Case below, 126 Fed. Rep. 449, 454.
Mr. F. H. Busbee for appellants.
Mr. Norris Morey for appellees.
Petition for a writ of certiorari denied.