General
JOSE D. PACHECO, Respondent, v. JUAN BEMAL, Appellant
2 Cal. 150·Supreme Court of California·1852·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JOSE D. PACHECO, Respondent, v. JUAN BEMAL, Appellant.
Where the appellant had failed to file a transcript of the record showing that the appeal had been perfect. The Court ordered it dismissed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.
This was an appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District for Solano County.
[MAJORITY]
February 4th. On motion of Williams and Jones, for the respondents, and filing a transcript of the record, the appellant having failed to do so, and the transcript showing that the appeal was perfected November 3d, 1851, the Court ordered that the appeal be dismissed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.