General
In the Matter of the Application of Cecil B. Ruskay, an Attorney and Counselor at Law, to Determine and Enforce His Attorney's Lien, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Richard E. Weldon and George Kent Weldon, Respondents, Appellants; Thomas J. Smith and National Surety Company, Respondents
237 A.D. 886·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1933·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Cecil B. Ruskay, an Attorney and Counselor at Law, to Determine and Enforce His Attorney’s Lien, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Richard E. Weldon and George Kent Weldon, Respondents, Appellants; Thomas J. Smith and National Surety Company, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.