Contracts · MBE-tested
Adolph Buchholtz, Respondent, v. Bradley Contracting Company, Appellant
171 A.D. 899·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adolph Buchholtz, Respondent, v. Bradley Contracting Company, Appellant.
Appeal from ajudgmentof the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 10th day of February, 1915, on the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered on the 18th day of February, 1915, denying a motion for a new trial.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The finding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence is without evidence to sustain it. That finding is, therefore, reversed, the judgment and order appealed from are reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Smith, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.