Torts · MBE-tested

David Lovallo vs. The Hayes and Pierce Motor Company, Incorporated

98 Conn. 831·Connecticut Supreme Court·1922·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

David Lovallo vs. The Hayes and Pierce Motor Company, Incorporated. Third Judicial District. Argued October 31st decided November 27th, 1922. Action to recover damages for injuries to the person and automobile of the plaintiff, alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before Keeler, J.; the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $1,000, which the trial court set aside as against the evidence, and from this decision the plaintiff appealed. No error. Charles W. Bauby, for the appellant (plaintiff). J. Birney Tuttle and Walter E. Monagan, for the appellee (defendant). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The trial court granted the motion to set aside the verdict as against the evidence. Upon examination of the evidence we find no error of law in this ruling. There is no error.