General
In the Matter of David F. Jaros, Respondent, v. City of Niagara Falls, Appellant
221 A.D.2d 1024635 N.Y.S.2d 564·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1995·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of David F. Jaros, Respondent, v City of Niagara Falls, Appellant.
[635 NYS2d 564]
[MAJORITY]
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of respondent, the City of Niagara Falls, to dismiss the petition on the ground that the proceeding was not timely commenced (see, Matter of Comerford v City of Niagara Falls, 214 AD2d 1055; Matter of Fabrizio v City of Niagara Falls, 214 AD2d 1055; Matter of Westendorf v City of Niagara Falls, 214 AD2d 1056). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.