Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fred A. Brooke et al., etc. Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, 1911 — 220 U.S. 626 · caselaw · US
General
The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fred A. Brooke et al., etc. Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York
220 U.S. 626·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 830.
The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fred A. Brooke et al., etc. Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
April 17, 1911.
The Attorney General for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. Wickham Smith for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed per stipulation of counsel, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Lehmann for the plaintiff in error.