General

S. M. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. W. W. REYNOLDS, Respondent

1 Cal. Unrep. 60·Supreme Court of California·1857·CA

I concur: Burnett, J.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

S. M. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. W. W. REYNOLDS, Respondent. No. 1413; March 10, 1857. Execution. — Things in Action are Property so as to be subject to levy in execution. APPEAL from Eleventh Judicial District, El Dorado County. Sanderson & Hewes for appellant,- Robertson & Hume for respondent. [MAJORITY — TERRY, J.] TERRY, J. — The only question presented by the record is whether, under our statute, things in action are property and subject to be taken in execution. This point was fully considered in the ease of Adams & Co. v. Hackett & Casserly, [7 Cal. 187], decided at this term, and upon the authority of that case the judgment of the court below is reversed and cause remanded. I concur: Burnett, J.