General
Aiken et al. v. Insull et al.; DeMet's, Incorporated, et al. v. Insull et al.; Insull et al. v. Aiken et al.; Insull et al. v. DeMet's, Incorporated; and Field v. DeMet's, Incorporated
315 U.S. 806·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 821.
Aiken et al. v. Insull et al.; DeMet’s, Incorporated, et al. v. Insull et al.; Insull et al. v. Aiken et al.; Insull et al. v. DeMet’s, Incorporated; and Field v. DeMet’s, Incorporated.
No. 822.
No. 823.
No. 824.
No. 827.
February 16, 1942.
Messrs. Edmund D. Adcock, Lewis F. Jacobson, George F. Callaghan, and Albert W. Froehde for petitioners in Nos. 821 and 822, and respondents in Nos. 823, 824, and 827. Messrs. Conrad H. Poppenhusen, Edward R. Johnston, Floyd E. Thompson, Edward J. Farrell, and John J. Heady for Samuel Insull, Jr. et al., respondents in Nos. 821 and 822, and petitioners in Nos. 823 and 824; and Messrs. Donald F. McPherson, Kenneth F. Burgess, and James F. Oates, Jr., for Stanley Field, petitioner in No. 827 and respondent in No. 822.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.