Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tate et al. v. Hickel, Secretary of the Interior, et al., 1970 — 396 U.S. 998 · caselaw · US
General
Tate et al. v. Hickel, Secretary of the Interior, et al.
396 U.S. 998·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 300.
Tate et al. v. Hickel, Secretary of the Interior, et al.
Solicitor General Griswold on the motion for Stone, and Houston Bus Hill on the motion for Dorita High Horse.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 815.] Motion of Richard B. Stone for leave to argue pro hac vice in behalf of Hickel granted. Motion of respondent, Dorita High Horse, to remove case from summary calendar denied. Fifteen additional minutes allotted to each side.