Contracts · MBE-tested
O'CONNOR v. LEVINE
152 N.Y.S. 1131·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O’CONNOR v. LEVINE.
(No. 7026.)
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
March 19, 1915.)
Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Daniel P. O’Connor against Arthur J. Levine. B’rom an order denying motion to vacate order for examination of defendant before trial, defendant appeals. Reversed. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 1134. Herbert C. Smyth, of New York City, for appellant. Wm. L. Tierney, of New York City, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff having knowledge of the contract which be claims was made with the defendant, he is not entitled to examine the defendant before trial ¡for the purpose of framing a complaint. The order appealed from must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate granted, with $10 costs.