Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Accounting of John C. King, as Executor of Patrick Eagan, Deceased, Respondent. Sarah Eagan et al., Appellants, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 626 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Accounting of John C. King, as Executor of Patrick Eagan, Deceased, Respondent. Sarah Eagan et al., Appellants
188 N.Y. 626·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Accounting of John C. King, as Executor of Patrick Eagan, Deceased, Respondent. Sarah Eagan et al., Appellants.
(Argued April 30, 1907;
decided May 21, 1907.)
Matter of King, 115 App. Div. 751, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 14, 1906, which affirmed a decree of the Monroe County Surrogate’s Court overruling objections to and settling the accounts of the executor of Patrick Eagan, deceased.
Harlan W. Rippey for appellants.
Jolvn M. Murphy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.