Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Zschernig et al. v. Miller, Administrator, et al., 1967 — 386 U.S. 1030 · caselaw · US
General
Zschernig et al. v. Miller, Administrator, et al.
386 U.S. 1030·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 730.
Zschernig et al. v. Miller, Administrator, et al.
Peter A. Schwabe, Sr., for appellants. Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Wayne M. Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State Land Board of Oregon. Solicitor General Marshall filed a memorandum for the United States, by invitation of the Court, 385 U. S. 998.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ore. Probable jurisdiction noted.