Contracts · MBE-tested
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
375 U.S. 881·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 277.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission.
Harry S. Littman, Joseph J. Daniels, Dale A. Wright, Richard Littell and Melvin Richter for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer, Richard A. Solomon and Howard E. Wahrenbrock for respondent. John T. Miller, Jr. for Independent Natural Gas Assn, of America, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.