General
Daniel Buckley et al., Respondents, v. New York and Boston Dyewood Company, Appellant
190 N.Y. 516·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel Buckley et al., Respondents, v. New York and Boston Dyewood Company, Appellant.
Buckley v. N. Y. & Boston Dyewood Co., 113 App. Div. 911, affirmed.
(Submitted October 31, 1907;
decided November 19, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 13, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action for an injunction to restrain the use of certain machinery in defendant’s factory.
Welton C. Percy for appellant.
Robert H. Roy for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Dissenting: Chase, J. Absent: Werner, J.